Missouri Compromise Lincoln Information
1 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
2 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
3 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
4 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
5 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
6 Missouri Compromise Lincoln Loading
Top Questions and Answers
Compare and Contrast the political climate surrounding: Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850 and Lincol Compare and Contrast the political climate surrounding: Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850 and Lincoln’s Election. How was it at Federal Level, Why did it become impossible to continue to resolve sectional differences through compromise? Did the outcome of the Civil War provide resolution?

Joseph replied: "These questions were posted on Yahoo many many times, I suggest you go through them and find what suits you: .?p=missouri+compromise"

If not for the Kansas-Nebraska Act, would the Missouri Compromise have worked as a long term strategy? The Whig stance supported by guys like Henry Clay and Abraham Lincoln was to contain slavery and let it die/suffocate over time - would that have worked? Could the Civil War have been avoided? If not, how long do you think hostilities would have held off if not for the Kansas-Nebraska Act?

angel_deverell replied: "I do not believe the Missouri Compromise would have worked; the fact that the 1850 compromise was necessary reveals that it was already breaking down. It would have been impossible to manage the division between slave and free state for long; the Fugitive Slave Law and the Dred Scott decision reveal only two of the many cracks that made the Missouri Compromise unworkable."

jefferson replied: "it wouldnt work because the states formed in the north out numbered the ones that would have adopted slavery."

FormerlyMulletedWonder replied: "The Kansas-Nebraska act was a result of the weakness of the Missouri Compromise. It did not come from no where and wreak havoc. I hate to say that anything in history is preordained but the sectional conflict between North and South is a good example of something that seemed to be building for a long time. Also included in this sectional conflict is the friction between state governments and the Federal government and which was to be superior. More than anything else establishing the primacy of the Federal government is the lasting effect of the Civil War."

Was the civil war inevitable or not? Why? Looking at: "Dread Scott Case" "Missouri Compromise" "Lincoln/Douglass Debates" "Mason/Dixon" "Kansas Nebraska Act"

steve_geo1 replied: "If you look at all those "cases," beginning with the Missouri compromise, it is obvious that the Civil War would have to happen. The Civil War was inherent in the "Declaration of Independence," written by Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that all men are created equal and wanted to write much else. The Missouri compromise extended slavery across the Mississippi River. The Kansas-Nebraska act (don't ask). Dred Scott enforced slavery claims in the north. Mason and Dixon were just surveyors; they had nothing to do with slavery. But they demarcated north from south. In short, to avoid the Civil War, northerners and southerners, slave owners and abolitionists, would have had to come together and arrange to settle their differences gradually, over many years, with the understanding that slavery must end. In this case, the south would have to give up slowly seats in the U.S. Senate that guaranteed slavery. Alternatively, the two sides must have come to an understanding like the U.S,. and the Soviet Union in recent years that the Soviet Union unilaterally stood down from arms and dissolved, assured that the U.S. would not attack. That happened. The Soviets were right. The Russians are safe today. So are we."

What were the views of Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas on slavery in the south? Slavery in the New Territories? The Missouri Compromise? The Kansas-Nebraska Act? and The Dred-Scott decision? Any good help is appreciated.

FOX News is the best replied: "they both opposed the expansion of slavery."

Place the following events in chronological order? Constitutional Convention Missouri Compromise Lincoln/Douglas Debates Election of 1860

history chronological order? Place the following events in chronological order: Constitutional Convention Missouri Compromise Lincoln/Douglas Debates Election of 1860 i dont think i have them in order!!

Kratz replied: "The order you have them in is correct."

handymanmike replied: "You most certainly do have them in correct order now. The Constitutional Convention happened in the 1770s, during the Revolutionary War. The Missouri Comprise was a major issue which lead to the dispute over slavery in The Civil War, probably in the 1850s. The Lincoln Douglas debates were political debates between the two candidates of the 1860 election, so pre election 1860. Then lastly the actual election itself."

history help! thank you? Brown v. Board of Educationa and Plessy v. Ferguson What was the goal of the plaintiff in the Brown case? explain what Amendment to the Constitution both of these cases involved. What was the result of these two cases? 2. Place the following events in chronological order. Constitutional Convention Missouri Compromise Lincoln/Douglas Debates Election of 1860

handymanmike replied: "I believe the Brown vs. Board of Education case challenged the belief of "separate but equal" classrooms and schools (one for whites and one for blacks) premise. Brown did not want schools to be separate, because he felt they were not equal. The chronological order of the events you listed are in the correct order as listed."

helppp!!!!!! HISTORY QUESTION!? i need to put these events in chronological order pleeeasee :) Constitutional Convention : Missouri Compromise : Lincoln/Douglas Debates : Election of 1860

Maggie F replied: "they are in order"

what was the significance of the compromise of 1850...? what was the significance of the... -missouri compromise -kansas- nebraska act -emancipation proclamation -gettysburg address -civil rights act of 1866 -ratification of the 13th. 14th, and 15th amendments -lincoln douglas debates -pottawatomie massacre -dred scott case -John brown's raid on harpers ferry -firing on fort sumter -creation of the KKK -impeachment of president johnson please help =]

gentleroger replied: "First things first, go to your textbook. Write out what each of the items on your list are (ie what happened?). Then ask yourself: So What? Why does this matter? What effect did this have on other things? And write down the answer. That is the significance. If you are stuck, do a web search and you should be able to find a reliable source (not wikipedia) that will help you understand. Remember to keep it simple."

More Sites
Find More
Missouri Compromise Lincoln © 2009